Policy Questionnaire for Candidates
This was the questionnaire that PAD and animal advocates
across Britain put to candidates in the May 2005 General Election.
 |
|
Hunting ban
Will you support the ban on hunting with hounds,
and the thorough enforcement of the ban? YES / NO
Following widespread public opposition to hunting with
hounds and several free votes in the House of Commons
to abolish the practice, the ban has finally passed
into law. Liberal theory itself recognises that the
legitimate sphere of personal freedom does not extend
to violence towards others.
For more details see the hunting
with hounds manifesto. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Reform of Animal
Protection Policy institutions
Will you support the replacement of current
policy-making institutions that affect animals with
a new Animal Protection Commission? YES / NO
Existing government institutions that affect the interests
and welfare of animals - such as the Home Office Animals
(Scientific Procedures) Inspectorate and relevant divisions
within the Department for the Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs - appear to have become dominated by industries
and institutions that use animals and cause suffering.
There are concerns that these bodies fail to protect
animal welfare as regulations require, and take insufficient
account of public opinion. With respect to animal experimentation,
two-thirds of the public do not trust the regulatory
system, and only 6% trust government statements. (1)
For more details see the institutional
reform manifesto. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Ban battery egg
farming
Do you support a ban on all caged and battery
egg farming by 2009? YES / NO
Battery farming of eggs - involving 21 million hens
every year - is arguably the cruellest form of farming
in the UK. Current EU plans to replace conventional
battery cage with 'enriched' battery cages by 2012 fail
to tackle the problem. 'Enriched' battery cages share
many of the serious welfare problems common to the conventional
battery cage. All cages - whether traditional battery
or so-called 'enriched' - are inherently cruel and cause
laying hens to suffer throughout their lives.
A recent MORI poll revealed an overwhelming 86 percent
of people think battery cage systems are cruel, and
78 per cent believe the government should ban them now,
as a priority. The EU proposals are minimum standards,
and member states are free to implement higher standards
in national law.
For more details see the battery
egg farming manifesto. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Tackling factory
farming
Do you support measures to end the factory
farming of animals - including broiler chickens, turkeys,
ducks, other birds, pigs and cows - through measures
such as reduced stocking densities, decreased growth
rates, banning of cruel methods designed to maximise
productivity, mandatory provision of enrichment to enable
animals to better fulfil behavioural needs, banning
of genetic modification of farmed animals, and reform
of economic support to discourage factory farming? YES
/ NO
Hundreds of millions of animals are intensively - or
'factory' - farmed in Britain every year. Many of the
techniques involved are acknowledged to potentially
cause severe physical and psychological suffering. To
take just one example, more than 800 million chickens
were slaughtered in the UK during 2003 to provide poultry
meat. The life span of an unconfined chicken can be
up to 10 years, yet table fowls or broilers reach adult
size and are slaughtered at six weeks of age. These
enforced and unnaturally rapid growth rates mean that
the animals spend a significant period of their short
lives in chronic pain. Furthermore, around 100,000 chicks/birds
die every day because of a number of ailments related
to their lack of fitness. (2)
80% of the public would like to see better welfare conditions
for farmed animals in Britain. (3)
For more details see the factory
farming manifesto. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Ban primate experimentation
Do you support a ban on experiments on all
non-human primates? YES / NO
Primates possess many qualities which were once considered
solely human attributes. There are similarities between
the social behaviour, emotional needs and intellectual
capabilities of humans and other primates. Primates
demonstrate the ability to reason, to exhibit friendship
and altruism, and to suffer fear and stress.
In 2003, 4799 experiments using 3073 primates were
conducted in the UK, making this country the largest
user of primates in the European Union. However, a majority
of the British public are opposed to primate experimentation.
(4) The Government appears
to have begun to accept the basic argument against primate
experimentation through its announcement of a ban of
the use of Great Apes in 1997.
For more details see the primate
experiments manifesto. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Independent inquiry
into animal research
Will you support an independent, balanced inquiry
to investigate the scientific and ethical questions
surrounding animal experimentation and review current
legislation and its implementation? YES / NO
A recent study published in the British Medical Journal
uncovered evidence that 'seriously undermined the principle
that animal experiments are necessary to inform human
medicine'. (5) 83% of doctors
support an independent investigation into the medical
relevance of animal experimentation. (6)
As noted in relation to question 2, the majority of
the public do not trust the government to implement
the statutory cost-benefit assessment of proposed animal
research in a fair and balanced manner. Two-thirds of
the public say they are either 'fairly' or 'very interested'
in the issue of animal experiments. (7)
For more details see the animal
experiments inquiry manifesto. |
REFERENCES:
- MORI poll cited by Macnaghten, P (2001)
Animal Futures: Public Attitudes and Sensibilities
towards Animals and Biotechnology in Contemporary
Britain. (Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology
Commission) p. 45.
- Source: RSPCA
- Macnaghten, p. 46.
- See www.animalaid.org.uk/press/0306prim.htm
- Pound, P. et al., "Where is the
evidence that animal research benefits humans?"
BMJ 2004; 328: 514-517.
- www.curedisease.net/news/040903.shtml
- Macnaghten, p. 44.
^ |
|